If you are going to validate JSON you would do it with a JSON schema, not an 
XML schema. From what I understand almost nobody does it. So the answer to your 
question is that it doesn’t need an answer because it isn’t required.


Ralph 

> On Apr 12, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I still do not see how this can be changed AND still have the ability to
> generically validate log events as I asked in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?focusedCommentId=13995487&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13995487
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Gary,
>> 
>> I am not sure how this got implemented this way despite me objecting and
>> saying it was wrong.  Please fix it.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Apr 11, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You'll see if a toggle or a new appender makes sense depending on how
>> much
>>> code disruption this causes.
>>> 
>>> Keep in mind that the Jackson-based appenders work for JSON, XML, and
>> YAML
>>> formats.
>>> 
>>> Make sure you base on work on the latest from Git master.
>>> 
>>> Good luck!
>>> Gary
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, John Bush <johntylerb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> lol, well see, now I know you read it.  Sorry, I'm just kinda like
>> that...
>>>> 
>>>> But seriously I can probably whip up a patch for a toggle, that sounds
>> like
>>>> a reasonable approach.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> "They are also Java nazi's" [sic]?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Really? Is that necessary?
>>>>> 
>>>>> How about providing a patch for either an alternate JSON layout or a
>>>> toggle
>>>>> on the current layout?
>>>>> 
>>>>> That would sure be more productive that name calling.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gary
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John Bush <johntylerb...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you are frustrated by how the ootb JsonLayout handles context data,
>>>>> see
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've published how I worked around it here:
>>>>>> https://github.com/johntbush/log4j2-jsonlayout
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to