...or a standardized non-binary format (like GELF, JSON based).
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using syslog is a pretty standard way to collect logs from all sorts of
> programs and goes back decades. There has been an update to the syslog
> format in RFC 5424 which fleshes it out a bunch.
> Then there are programs like Logstash and Flume which can be used in a more
> platform-agnostic manner to collect logs from different applications.
> Really, when it comes down to it, the most standard way you can log
> everything regardless of programming language is to use log files or some
> sort of network appender using a standardized binary format.
> On 18 October 2016 at 08:53, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> > I guess platform is vague. Maybe I should have said language agnostic.
> > It would be nice to have a single logging architecture/design run on
> > .NET, Java, etc. Or at least it seems like a nice feature to me. I
> > assume there are many enterprises out there that have applications
> > on different OS's and languages. If I'm trying to pick a logging
> > to use and I find a popular one which is capable and runs similarly
> > the OS's and languages then that's a big plus in my mind.
> > Thanks,
> > Nick
> > ________________________________
> > From: Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:52 AM
> > To: Log4J Users List
> > Subject: Re: porting log4j2 to .NET
> > Just to make things clear, Log4j is a logging framework for the JVM
> > platform, and it is agnostic to the underlying OS. It it well tested on
> > least) both Linux and Windows.
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> > > Figured I would send this question out to the log4j side. I have
> > > had some email exchanges with the log4net mailing list regarding
> > > log4j2 to .NET. My suggestion was that the apache logging framework
> be a
> > > single architecture design which is platform agnostic and then teams
> > which
> > > port to the different platforms. It seems log4net was a port of log4j
> > and
> > > may be going off in its own direction from that initial port. My
> > viewpoint
> > > is that's a bad idea as one of the benefits I saw was that log4net was
> > > similar to log4j2 and we're looking for logging frameworks for our
> > > enterprise. We have applications on both Windows/.NET and Linux/Java
> > > having a logging framework for Windows/.NET which is similar to a
> > > framework for Linux/Java was a big plus.
> > >
> > >
> > > While I have no doubt the effort to port log4j2 to .NET is
> > > it would be a port and thus I'm not spending time figuring out design
> > > algorithms. Would anyone want to venture a guess at what that effort
> > might
> > > be?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Nick
> > >
> > --
> > [image: MagineTV]
> > *Mikael Ståldal*
> > Senior software developer
> > *Magine TV*
> > mikael.stal...@magine.com
> > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com<
> > http://www.magine.com>
> > [https://de.magine.com/content/uploads/2016/09/magine_global_social.png
> > http://www.magine.com/>
> > TV online with Magine TV<http://www.magine.com/>
> > www.magine.com
> > Watch the TV you love, on any device, anywhere in Germany and Sweden and
> > find out more about our global OTT B2B solutions. Get started today.
> > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
> > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> > email.
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
Senior software developer
Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com
Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply