Hi Gary, We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a opening a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this. Thank you ,
On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which version of Log4j are you using? > > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1. > > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira. > > Thank you, > Gary > > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <dima...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello All, > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to configure > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on > UMASK > > because we have managed services who's process should generate logs with > a > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because > the > > logs may contain sensitive information. > > > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the properties file. > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on > accepting > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution. > > > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching > requirements > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006: > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407 > > > > Thank you. > > >
