After a release candidate is created, it's up for review for at least 72 hours to be voted on. After that, if there are no issues with the release candidate, that candidate is promoted to Maven Central (which can take up to a day to fully mirror across all of Maven Central) and made available to download from apache.org.
On 26 February 2017 at 10:27, Shlomi Hazan <shl...@viber.com> wrote: > Great!!! > You're the man! > What does it usually take until artifacts are propagated to maven central ? > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > Oh - we do have to finalize how to get the new Scala project on the web > > site but that actually doesn’t have to be part of the Log4j release. > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Feb 26, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Well, this was the last bug that I saw that was critical to get fixed > so > > I might start the release today - unless something gets in my way. > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > >> On Feb 26, 2017, at 3:18 AM, Shlomi Hazan <shl...@viber.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi guys, > > >> > > >> The broken rolling file appender - LOG4J2-1804 (sorry for duplicating > it > > >> with LOG4J2-1821) > > >> has a very wide effect on our log collection across many servers, > > >> and it would be a great deal of effort to update and test all the > > >> configuration files to walk around the issue. > > >> > > >> My question is - how fast can users expect a 2.8.1 fix version to be > GA? > > >> I need to know that to decide how to handle the situation before the > > code > > >> goes into production. > > >> > > >> I saw Dr. David Akehurst asking for a version as well for LOG4J2-1799, > > >> and seeing Ralph's (Goers) response I understand that you guys cant > just > > >> pop a version for every bug fix, > > >> but the rolling appender issue is really breaking a very fundamental > > >> logging behavior, > > >> so I must be in a rather large group of users affected. > > >> As a matter of fact - any user that happened to use a rolling pattern > > that > > >> does not prepend the '%i' with a dash. > > >> > > >> Anyway, I hope it's not our of the question for you guys to be able to > > kick > > >> out a version within like a week or so, > > >> but if that is not the case just let us know. > > >> > > >> Appreciate your work, > > >> Shlomi > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
