If you add this, don't forget to do some performance tests to verify that it actually improves performance.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Jaromir Hamala <jaromir.ham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Matt, > > thanks for you reply. I realized this is something what should > probably be handled inside Surefire and not inside Log4J. > > I'll talk to Surefire folks. > > Cheers, > Jaromir > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sounds like an interesting use case. Patches are always welcome! Make > sure > > to file a JIRA ticket as well so we have something to refer to in the > > changelog. > > > > On 13 April 2017 at 09:29, Jaromir Hamala <jaromir.ham...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I wonder whether log4j could add (optional) buffering into the Console > > > Appender. > > > I believe it could be useful e.g. when the stdout is redirected to a > file > > > (think of Maven Surefire), etc. > > > > > > Would you accept a patch adding this? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Jaromir > > > > > > -- > > > “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but > when > > > there is nothing left to take away.” > > > Antoine de Saint Exupéry > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > > > > -- > “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when > there is nothing left to take away.” > Antoine de Saint Exupéry > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* mikael.stal...@magine.com Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
