Understood, but if I needed log4extras, would I just have just log4extras on the classpath or (log4jextras and log4j) on the classpath
On Nov 17, 2017 1:36 PM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Log4jextras was extra stuff for Log4j 1. Log4j 1 is not longer supported > so neither would be log4jextras. > > Ralph > > > On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Sorry if this has been asked before, but i'm not clear on whether or not > > log4jextras is a replacement for log4j or an add on? > > > > I've running into some issues where they are both in the classpath > causing > > a conflict between the Appender interface and am looking for solutions. > > Thanks! > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org > >
