Hi Ralph, Yes, that is the behavior I want ie all logs without a marker need to get printed because they are placed in such a way that they don’t need any throttling. The ones that need throttling will be logged using the marker.
However, I want different throttling for different markers. They all go to the same log ie there is only one logger/appender. So, is it possible to assign burst filters at a marker level? Thanks, Bharat. On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:03 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Your filter configuration says “If this is an event with a throttle marker > continue checking. If it is not a throttle marker log it, regardless of its > logging level.” Is that really what you want? > > If you want to throttle different calls to different loggers independently > than just put the burst filter on the logger or the logger’s appender > reference. > > Ralph > > > On Jul 27, 2020, at 10:32 PM, bharat naik <bharat.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am using log4j2 in my project (2.11.1) and there are several places in > my > > code where I need to throttle the logging, in case of exceptions, and > hence > > wanted to use the burst filter. > > > > However, I don’t see a way of using multiple burst filters with different > > rate and maxBurst for different logging invocations, all going to the > same > > log file. > > > > For example, what I have so far is: > > > > <Filters> > > <MarkerFilter marker="THROTTLE"onMatch="NEUTRAL" > onMismatch="ACCEPT" > > /> > > <BurstFilter level="WARN" rate="1"maxBurst="1”/> > > </Filters> > > > > and invoking it via: > > > > A() > > { > > .. > > logger.warn(throttle, “msg”); <—throttle is a marker for “THROTTLE" > > .. > > } > > > > B() > > { > > .. > > logger.warn(throttle, “msg”); > > .. > > } > > > > However, instead if I could have multiple burst filters for different > > markers that would be ideal since currently I could miss log messages > from > > B() and only log A() since they all go through one burst filter. > Basically, > > I want to ensure at least one log output for every call to > logger.warn(..), > > and throttle each of them independently. > > > > Is that possible? > > > > Thanks, > > Bharat. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org > >