This deserves a really long answer that I should add to my blog site. I’ll post a shorter answer on stackoverflow.
Ralph > On Oct 25, 2021, at 4:07 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I posted the following question on stackoverflow a few days ago [1]. Any > feedback is much appreciated. > > Log4j2 currently supports 4 configuration formats: XML, JSON, YAML, and > properties syntax. I couldn't find in the documentation if all the formats > are exactly equivalent in terms of feature coverage. > > Is it possible to use all features of Log4j2 in every format or are there > certain formats that lack some expressiveness? > > I vaguely remember in the past that I had some trouble setting up a feature > in the property syntax while it was working in the XML syntax; it could be > my lack of knowledge at the time instead of a missing feature but if > somebody can provide a reference about equivalence or not it would be > helpful. > > Best, > Stamatis > > [1] > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69659109/log4j2-configuration-format-with-best-coverage --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
