Curt, Sorry if I missed any previous messages about this board report.
At the moment there is no log4net development work scheduled apart from bug fixing and evaluating contributed patches. We previously had a discussion on the use and storage of strong name assembly signing keys. We did not reach a conclusion on this issue and I personally feel that it needs further discussion at wider level, and probably requires some sort of consensus amongst all the .NET projects. While a 3rd party can build a functionally identical assembly from the log4net source, the private signing key prevents them from building an assembly which is actually identical. I'm not sure if this is something that needs to be raised with the board directly but I think that it needs to be discussed by the great minds of Apache rather than by log4net itself. Regards, Nicko > -----Original Message----- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 November 2006 22:04 > To: Log4NET Dev > Subject: ASF board status report > > ASF board meets on November 15th and a quarterly board report > is due. I'm sorry to have not been following log4net very > much recently, so if you have anything that you think should > be reported to the board, please reply and I'll add it to the report. >
