Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Ron Grabowski <[email protected]>wrote:

> I emailed Nicko asking him what I need to do to get the .snk file onto my
> system. It looks like the version in source control is encrypted.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Omer Mor <[email protected]>
> *To:* Log4NET Dev <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wed, October 7, 2009 9:01:18 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Debugging log4net source
>
> I'm trying again to get some help from the log4net developers community:I 
> really need
> to get a release build with pdb.
> I explained blow exactly what needs to be changed in the nant script to
> build it this way.
> It should only take a couple of minutes to do this.
> I would have done it myself if the assembly signing key would have been
> public.
> Maybe if no one is free to compile it, then I could join the log4net dev
> team, and get permission to access the signing key?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>   Omer Mor.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Omer Mor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks.First - you should change the nant script:
>> In the file <root>\log4net.include line 171 should be changed from:
>>         <property name="build.debug" value="false" />
>> to:
>>         <property name="build.debug" value="pdbonly" />
>> then just run the build script (build.cmd) and the release folder (
>> <root>\bin\net\2.0\release\) should contain both the dll and pdb files.
>>
>> I suggest making the change in the nant script permanent as it does not
>> affect performance and allows for debugging into log4net source.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>   Omer Mor.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Ron Grabowski <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Tell me the exact nant command line to run and I'll run it.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Omer Mor <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* Log4NET Dev <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:49:03 AM
>>> *Subject:* Re: Debugging log4net source
>>>
>>> I would like to ask again the developer community of log4net for a signed
>>> build of 1.2.10 assembly that was compiled with a PDB file.This is the
>>> best way for us to enable live debugging of the log4net source.
>>> I believe it would only take a couple of minutes to compile it this way,
>>> and it would help us tremendously.
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>>   Omer Mor ([email protected])
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Omer Mor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I prefer debugging the situation live.Is it so hard to re-compile
>>>> 1.2.10 with pdb? It's just a matter of a slight tweak in the project
>>>> settings.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Ron Grabowski 
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have you tried specifying a custom error handler on the appender to
>>>>> track down when it enters a failed state?
>>>>>
>>>>> <appender name=".." >
>>>>>   ...
>>>>>   <errorHandler type="Your.ErrorHandler, YourAssembly" />
>>>>> </appender>
>>>>>
>>>>> You would write one that sends an email when the file can't be created.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From:* Omer Mor <[email protected]>
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 6, 2009 3:02:17 AM
>>>>> *Subject:* Debugging log4net source
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> to research a (rare) bug we have with log4net (log file is not being
>>>>> created) we wanted to debug its source.
>>>>> However, the release build of 1.2.10 is supplied without a pdb file.
>>>>> And since it is a signed assembly we can't compile it ourself and
>>>>> replace it.
>>>>> Also - the debug build of 1.2.10 is supplied with a pdb, but is not
>>>>> signed, so it is not substitutable.
>>>>> What I'd like to ask is that one of the developers compile a release
>>>>> build of 1.2.10 and enable pdb creation, so that we could debug the 
>>>>> source.
>>>>>
>>>>> Using a non-signed copy of log4net is not an option for us, because
>>>>> some of our 3rd-party assemblies are compiled against the signed 1.2.10
>>>>> log4net assembly.
>>>>>
>>>>> The files could be sent irectly to me at [email protected] .
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>   Omer Mor.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to