I think it would be beneficial to add the svn url (with revision) to the assembly description then so this information is available to the end user.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > after playing with it I was faced with a compiler warning about the > format. "Standard" version formats require the numbers to be unsigned > shorts whose range the ASF's svn revisions have long left behind. > > The result is not only a warning that we could ignore but also a version > number that is not really predictable (could be a modulo operation, in > either case it does not show the 1.1 million number that would > correspond to the revision). > > We'll stick with .0 for now. > > Stefan >
