[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13248077#comment-13248077
]
Stefan Bodewig edited comment on LOG4NET-27 at 4/6/12 5:32 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
This issue may be the one with the most votes, but if you search around JIRA
you'll see RollingFileAppender is broken in so many ways. I think it is
responsible for about a third of all reports.
Last summer when we waded through the issues to triage what should go into
1.2.11 I deliberately left out all RFA issues as - to be honest - I don't think
it can be fixed without rewriting it. Back then some people started to work on
a new implementation so this decision seemed to be a good one.
Unfortunately life has interfered with the efforts of back then, as with the
time I can devote to log4net myself. I'll look into the latest incarnation of
this patch but honestly would prefer a re-thought and re-written RFA myself.
Are there enough people watching this issue who would actually be able to build
log4net from svn trunk to verify it fixes their problem (and doesn't introduce
new ones) before I'd cut a new release?
was (Author: bodewig):
This issue may be the one with the most votes, but of you search around
JIRA you'll see RollingFileAppender is broken in so many ways. I think it is
responsible for about a third of all reports.
Last summer when we waded through the issues to triage what should go into
1.2.11 I deliberately left out all RFE issues as - to be honest - I don't think
it can be fixed without rewriting it. Back then some people started to work on
a new implementation so this decision seemed to be a good one.
Unfortunately life has interfered with the efforts of back then, as with the
time I can devote to log4net myself. I'll look into the latest incarnation of
this patch but honestly would prefer a re-thought and re-written RFA myself.
Are there enough people watching this issue who would actually be able to build
log4net from svn trunk to verify it fixes their problem (and doesn't introduce
new ones) before I'd cut a new release?
> Rolling files on date/time boundaries doesn't support a maximum number of
> backup files.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4NET-27
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-27
> Project: Log4net
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Appenders
> Affects Versions: 1.2.11
> Reporter: Florian Ramillien
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.2 Maintenance Release
>
> Attachments: LOG4NET-27.patch, RollingFileAppender.cs,
> RollingFileAppender.cs, RollingFileAppender.cs, RollingFileAppender.cs.patch,
> RollingFileAppender.patch
>
>
> A maximum of backup files exist when rolling files on file size, but not for
> rolling on date/time.
> This can be implemented with the same config key : MaxSizeRollBackups
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
