And yet another month went past and I've got to apologize for being unable to test this so far on another machine. However, since this is no regression from 1.2.11 and the tests fail only for me and I was unable to find out what's actually going on on this machine, it is probably okay to throw out 1.2.12. Do you agree?
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] >Gesendet: Freitag, 9. August 2013 13:58 >An: 'Log4NET Dev' >Betreff: AW: Tagging 1.2.12 > >I've already tried the 1.2.11 binary with the current tests (except the >DynamicPatternLayout tests) and the RemotingAppenderTests fail too. >Nevermind, I'll try it later on another machine as soon as I get home. > >>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] >>Gesendet: Freitag, 9. August 2013 13:13 >>An: Log4NET Dev >>Betreff: Re: Tagging 1.2.12 >> >>On 2013-08-09, Dominik Psenner wrote: >> >>> Do you have the possibility to try the tests on a win7? >> >>Not without quite a bit of effort (i.e. obtaining an Apache MSDN >>subscription and installing win7 in the first place :-). >> >>You may want to check out the svn tag of log4net 1.2.11 and see whether >>the tests pass there - so we know whether we've introduced a new bug or >>are dealing with an old issue that may only affect the test. We'd >>certainly know by now if the RemotingAppender didn't work at all in >>1.2.11. >> >>Stefan
