[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13777552#comment-13777552
 ] 

Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-232:
----------------------------------------

In that case my VM won't help as it runs XP SP3.

Do you know what kind of exception is raised on older systems?
                
> Use ReaderWriterLockSlim instead of ReaderWriterLock.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4NET-232
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-232
>             Project: Log4net
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.10
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Aron Weiler
>            Assignee: Dominik Psenner
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.2.12
>
>
> ReaderWriterLock should be replaced with ReaderWriterLockSlim according to 
> Microsoft for performance and simplification reasons.
> MSDN: 
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.threading.readerwriterlock.aspx
> The .NET Framework has two reader-writer locks, ReaderWriterLockSlim and 
> ReaderWriterLock. ReaderWriterLockSlim is recommended for all new 
> development. ReaderWriterLockSlim is similar to ReaderWriterLock, but it has 
> simplified rules for recursion and for upgrading and downgrading lock state. 
> ReaderWriterLockSlim avoids many cases of potential deadlock. In addition, 
> the performance of ReaderWriterLockSlim is significantly better than 
> ReaderWriterLock. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to