[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14985933#comment-14985933
]
Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-487:
-----------------------------------------
Agreed, however the configuration option should include the following
possibilities:
* global mutex
* local mutex
* thread lock
* no lock
The only thing I do not like is that this is another configuration option
whereas this could maybe detected from the already configured lockingmodel.
What do you think?
> Control mutex type
> ------------------
>
> Key: LOG4NET-487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-487
> Project: Log4net
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Appenders
> Affects Versions: 1.2.14, 1.3.0
> Reporter: NN
> Assignee: Dominik Psenner
>
> The only missing feature is an option for choosing Local (per session) or
> Global (per machine) mutex.
> The current code just uses the filename for mutex which good but it always
> makes a local one, so if you have two sessions you cannot synchronize them.
> Default is Local for backward compatibility.
> See Note in:
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.threading.mutex%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
>
> I think it can be an option like
> <RollingMutexType value="Global" />
> or something like that.
> It also applies to FileAppender mutex .
> <LockingModel InterProcessLock>
> <LockingMutexType value="Global" />
> </..>
> See issue #485 for reference.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
