Jeremiah, whats the state of your deployment? Have you made a notice of all the bugs I had introduced and that they are fixed in trunk? On 29 Nov 2015 4:38 p.m., "Dominik Psenner" <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 29 Nov 2015 10:54 a.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jerem...@gowdy.me> wrote: > > > > Agreed. We have to start drawing the drawing the line. .NET is so > backwards compatible, I think it's pretty left behind to leave .NET 2.0 and > beyond behind. As a carrier grade application we are far beyond needing > 2.0 support. > > Beware, there are devices out there that support only .net 3.5. i am glad > we could come to a sound agreement. > > > > > > On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> On 2015-11-27, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > >> > > >> In my opinion, all releases after 1.2.15 should be built against: > > > > > >> * mono 3.5 > > >> * mono 4.0 > > >> * .net 3.5 > > >> * .net 4.0 > > >> * .net 4.5 > > >> * .net cp 3.5 > > >> * .net cp 4.0 > > > > > > [...] > > > > > >> So what if we announce EOL for all the other builds? We can still try > to be > > >> backwards compatible to ancient framework versions, but whoever needs > a > > >> binary for it should build it from source. > > > > > > That's fine with me, but I should be the last one to call the shots. > > > > > > Stefan >
