The site and rat report look good, going to test the nuget binary tomorrow.
On 8 Mar 2017 9:39 p.m., "Dominik Psenner" <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am looking through the release and am going to give a few feedbacks > during the next hour. The first thing i noticed is this: > > The website page 'features' still mentions that log4net has builds for > ancient .net framework versions. We should change that. > > On 8 Mar 2017 7:52 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> log4net 2.0.8 RC1 is available for review here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net >> (revision 18620) >> >> Details of changes since 2.0.7 are in the release notes: >> https://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.8/release/re >> lease-notes.html >> >> I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. >> >> The tag is here: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/2.0.8RC1 >> (revision 1786048) >> >> Site: >> https://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.8/ >> >> RAT Report: >> https://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.8/rat-report.html >> >> Nuget Package: >> https://www.myget.org/feed/log4net-test/package/nuget/log4net >> >> Votes, please. This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours, >> 1900 GMT 11-Mar 2017 >> >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >> [ ] +0 OK, but... >> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... >> >> Thanks! >> >> Stefan >> >