You should note that while we consider all votes only PMC votes are “binding”. I don’t think that changes much however.
From a PMC perspective I have to say that keeping the user’s lists separate isn’t likely to be an issue as most of the things that would need to be discussed would be on a dev list anyway. Ralph > On Mar 9, 2017, at 2:45 AM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The votes are way too scattered over the different mailing lists so that I > didn't even find my own vote. ;-) Therefore I'm trying to summarize the > current state of the vote: > > log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> > d...@logging.apache.org <mailto:d...@logging.apache.org> > Matt Sicker: +1 > Ralph Goers: +1 > Stefan Bodewig: +1 > Sven Rautenverg: -1 > Thorsten Schöning: -0 > Ivan Habunek: -0 > Dominik Psenner: +1 > Remko Popma: +1 > Mikael Ståldal: +0 > > Totals so far: > +1: 5 > +0: 1 > -0: 2 > -1: 1 > > log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ -> > u...@logging.apache.org <mailto:u...@logging.apache.org> > > Matt Sicker: -1 > Ralph Goers: +1 > Stefan Bodewig: -1 > Sven Rautenverg: -1 > Thorsten Schöning: -0 > Ivan Habunek: -0 > Dominik Psenner: +1 > Remko Popma: +1 > Mikael Ståldal: -1 > > Totals so far: > +1: 3 > +0: 0 > -0: 2 > -1: 4 > Sorry to anyone who's vote is missing. > > On 2017-03-08 05:20, Matt Sicker wrote: >> I may be missing some mailing lists considering I just subscribed to half of >> them less than five minutes ago. >> >> This is a vote to merge the various Apache Logging Services mailing lists. >> The proposal is to combine them as follows: >> >> log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> >> d...@logging.apache.org <mailto:d...@logging.apache.org> >> log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ -> >> u...@logging.apache.org <mailto:u...@logging.apache.org> >> >> commits@ and private@ remain the same as before. >> >> The proposal would also suggest that the old emails become aliases for the >> combined email names so as not to lose any future emails. To distinguish >> between projects, a subject tag can be added such as: >> >> [java] >> [net] >> [cxx] >> [php] >> >> Though I wouldn't think such a tag is required, though it should help in >> gaining the attention of the appropriate audience. >> >> Voting: >> >> +1: Yes, combine the mailing lists! >> +0: Go ahead, don't care that much. >> -0: Don't like it, but not vetoing it. >> -1: No, don't do that! I have a better idea! >> >> This vote follows the same "lazy consensus" (at least 3 +1 binding, no >> -1/vetoes) we use for general releases and whatnot. The vote will be open >> for at least 72 hours. >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> >
