Ron,
Many thanks for your answer. This was exactly what I was looking for.
This is an elegant solution!
The only question I still have is the following:
The link you pointed me to (Log4NetLogger.cs) had only a partial
implementation of the ILog. This was not complicated to fill the gap.
However, I was just asking myself why this class only partially implemented
the interface.
Thanks again,
- José
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Grabowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4NET User" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: Wrapping Log4Net in a Facade --> incorrect LocationInfo shown
for file, methods....
I believe the pattern is called "abstract factory".
Your facade needs to perform logging using the methods on ILogger and
passing in the Type of your wrapper class. See this class for an
implementation and comments as to why its necessary:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ibatis/trunk/cs/mapper/IBatisNet.Common.Logging.Log4Net/Log4NetLogger.cs?revision=293509&view=markup
IBatisNet (ibatis.apache.org), Sooda (www.sooda.org), and The Castle Project
(www.castleproject.org) have abstracted logging libraries (to allow the user
to switch between log4net, NLog, and some simple builtin loggers like a
ConsoleLogger) that do similiar things. I recall there being similiar code
on gotdotnet.com sonewhere too.
----- Original Message ----
From: José Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:54:06 PM
Subject: Wrapping Log4Net in a Facade --> incorrect LocationInfo shown for
file, methods....
Hello,
We are trying the Log4Net in our projects. However, for different reasons,
we want to expose it to our developers through a Tracing/Error class
facade.
Doing so, we face the following problem:
Whenever an Appender print information about LocationInfo (File, line,
Method,....). It will take information related to the caller of the Log4Net
method (which is the facade in our case).
Is there any way to tell Log4Net not to walk more more level on the
stackTrace so as to retrieve the information?
Thanks a lot!
- Jose
