We're using log4net (the DLL version is 1.2.1.40796) in systems that require 24x7 reliability and haven't had any problems at all with either the RollingFileAppender or the TraceAppender on either single- or multi-processor servers (Windows 2003). I've got no qualms about using it in production, myself.
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:27:00 +0100, Dag Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have been using log4net in production since Summer 2002, and have > experienced no problems (even on SMP servers). We're using 1.2.0 beta 8 > now. Appenders we use are RollingFileAppender and ConsoleAppender (with > PatternLayout). > > Regards, > > Dag Christensen > Vestfold Butikkdata AS > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Slatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17. februar 2005 12:19 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Stability of log4net > > Hi guys > > I am currently evaluating log4net for use in a new project. I am > already familiar with log4j so feel pretty comforatble with the feature > set. The only concern is that log4net is no longer being maintained, > and that there are only beta releases of 1.2. > > Do you think log4net is OK for production code? Are there any > particular versions to go for from a stability point of view, or > versions to avoid? > > Cheers > > -- Eric Means [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.randomtree.org/eric/
