How are you configuring log4net? If using an Xml config file what does it 
contain?

Cheers,
Nicko

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco von Frieling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 29 May 2006 11:16
> To: Log4NET User
> Subject: Re: RE: LoggerMatchFilter question
> 
> Hi Nicko,
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I know and tried it. But it doesn't work and I don't know 
> why. I tried all Filters from log4net and my own one, started 
> my real or test app with and configured log4net. Then I 
> looked into the lo4net root logger and it's appenders (via 
> Quick Watch) and all filters are in the filter chain of my 
> RollingLogFileAppender, except log4net's LoggerMatchFilter 
> and my own one. Either if my own one inherits the 
> LoggerMatchFilter or the filter base class.
> 
> Marco
> 
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:28:41 +0100
> > Von: Nicko Cadell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: Log4NET User <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: RE: LoggerMatchFilter question
> > 
> > You can implement a filter in your own assembly and reference it in 
> > the configuration file. This should mean that you can make a filter 
> > that suites your requirements.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Nicko
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marco von Frieling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 17 May 2006 12:35
> > > To: Log4NET User
> > > Subject: LoggerMatchFilter question
> > > 
> > > Hello.
> > > 
> > > I would log messages from all types of a specific module (e. 
> > > g. caching) to an extra appender, lets say to a TraceAppender. 
> > > "Module" means that the classes functionalities are 
> related to one 
> > > topic, but they are in different namespaces and possibly 
> different 
> > > assemblies. So I thought I could use the 
> LoggerMatchFilter for this, 
> > > but it does not work because the filter uses the
> > > string.StartsWith() method.
> > > But for my szenario it should use the string.Contains() 
> method. Why 
> > > is does that filter not exist? Maybe you could implement 
> it in the 
> > > same filter with an additional parameter
> > > 
> > > <param name="useContains" value="true"/>
> > > 
> > > with the default set to false, so that this extension does not 
> > > change current behavior?
> > > 
> > > Marco
> > > 
> > > > --
> > > Marco von Frieling
> > > In den Ackern 8
> > > D-27374 Wittorf
> > > 
> > > eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
> > > "Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> --
> Marco von Frieling
> In den Ackern 8
> D-27374 Wittorf
> 
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer!
>       Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
>    
> 
> 

Reply via email to