José Joye wrote: > > However. in order not to be too hardly tight to log4net, we decided > to build a facade to abstract the Logging framework. This was done in > order to easily switch the logging framework we use behind the > scene. > > José > Thanks Jose, I had already decided to take that approach in case we wanted to swap out the underlying framework at some point. I am going to produce a test-bed app using both frameworks and see how I get on with both synchronous and asynchronous messaging. If I get time, I will move onto logging from different AppDomains etc Cheers, Steve -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Newbie%3A-Log4Net-or-MS-Logging-Application-Block--tf4669838.html#a13362856 Sent from the Log4net - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application Block? shaeney
- RE: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application Bloc... Walden H. Leverich
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application Bloc... Mike Liddell
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application ... shaeney
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Applicat... Mike Liddell
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Appl... shaeney
- RE: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Appl... Walden H. Leverich
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging... Mike Liddell
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application ... Peter Drier
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application Bloc... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application ... shaeney
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Applicat... Peter Drier
- RE: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Appl... Owen Corpening
- Re: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging... Michael Schall
