So the last time log4net upgraded from .9 to .10, that process was actually somewhat painful for me.. as you note a lot of components rely on log4net .10.. And dealing with different versions of log4net simultaneously wasn't fun (we weren't allowed to gac it for various reasons, nor do you want 2 copies of log4net loaded into a single process anyways).
Now, given that most to all of the updates/bug fixes are in the appenders, it *may* make sense to split log4net into 2 packages.. one that's the core log4net bits + appender skeleton + interfaces.. and one that's the bundled appenders.. That way, the third party packages (nunit, nhibernate, ...) can depend on the core log4net bits without having to upgrade every time Nicko does a appender bug fix.. This may even be enough to warrant a 1.3 ? Nicko? -Peter On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Yaojian <sky...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am totally agree with the reliable of log4net. > > I just want a bug-fix version, espically the UdpAppender issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-112 > > As lots of third-party components (for example, NHibernate) rely on > log4net's public GA 1.2.10, I have to rebuild all these third-party > components with my private build from the log4net svn :-( > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Peter Drier <peter.dr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Maybe when someone comes up with a legit feature need that it doesn't >> already cover? >> >> Seriously though, I've been using 1.2.10 for years now and log4net has >> been the most reliable 3rd party package I've used across many applications. >> The only things I've needed that it couldn't do fit easily in the appender >> and plugin frameworks. >> >> Don't fix what isn't broken! >> >> Peter >> >> On Apr 2, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Yaojian <sky...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >>> >>> anyone know that? >>> >>> >>> >
