Could someone please explain to some of the lurkers on these lists (like myself) what the differences we are talking about actually are?
In the .net world the accusations against log4net have largely been around the length of time to support new framework features properly (clr 2 lightweight locking models, and now probably lamda logging statements and structured logging). Would be interested to see what would be *gained* in a v2 port effort. On 17 Sep 2015 5:42 am, "Nicholas Duane" <nic...@msn.com> wrote: > Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists. > > I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)? Is it because > there is less development work being done on log4net and log4j had > significant changes in the 2.0 version? Any chance log4net might become > more of a "port" of log4j(2) and thus be more similar? > > Thanks, > Nick >
