> OK, I'll take care of it. Should we wait a bit to see if other PMCs
> have any remarks before generating RC2?

I don't think you need to wait. I guess people are happy when they
have to vote only once. I also think that the rest is really fine, so
if you have some time, go for it.

> I agree about the site. I'll put it up ASAP.

cool

> BTW, I'm updating the release plan from the wiki as I go through it.
> I'm doing the changes locally, and will update the wiki when it's
> done.

Great, thanks for taking care!

Cheers
Christian

>
> Regards,
> Ivan
>
> On 27 June 2011 13:35, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
>> md5/sigs are all fine
>> all package open
>> files ok, licenses ok
>>
>> but:
>>
>> * API docs show ${Version} in title (should be 2.1.0) - not a blocker
>> * build.xml is missing in the packages - it should be there, otherwise
>> the users cannot build the docs -> blocker imho
>>
>> Other question - can we upload the generated site on people while
>> releasing? It is easier to review it for the other PMCs.
>>
>> Unfortunately -1, because of the missing build.xml file :-(
>>
>> Cheers + thanks for the hard work!
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> It is my pleasure to announce the first release candidate for Apache
>>> log4php 2.1.0.
>>>
>>> Significant changes in this release include:
>>>  * a new logging level: trace
>>>  * a new appender: MongoDB (thanks to Vladimir Gorej)
>>>  * a plethora of bugfixes and other code improvements
>>>  * most of the site docs have been rewritten to make log4php more
>>> accessible to users
>>>
>>> Apache log4php 2.1.0 RC1 is available for review here:
>>>  * http://people.apache.org/builds/logging/log4php/2.1.0/RC1/
>>>
>>> The tag for this release is available here:
>>>  * http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4php/tags/apache-log4php-2.1.0/
>>>
>>> According to the process, please vote with:
>>> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead and release the artifacts
>>> [ ] -1 No, because...
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de

Reply via email to