Hi guys,

The 2.2.1 release is being voted on on the dev mailing list:
http://markmail.org/thread/ictidelq5selh4tm

This issue has been resolved by removing the INI_SCANNER_RAW flag.

You are welcome to check it out and give your vote.

Regards,
Ivan


On 28 January 2012 12:37, Marcelo Gornstein <marce...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
>> INI files support will not be removed for the foreseeable future so you can
>> continue using them if you're more comfortable that way. However, some
>> features may not be configurable using the INI format (currently only
>> filters). The reason for this is that INI format is increasingly harder to
>> interpret as the configuration gets more complex.
> I understand. Thanks for the clarification.
>
>> There is an easy way of converting your INI configuration to PHP:
>> $conf = new LoggerConfiguratorDefault();
>> $conf->parse('config.ini');
>>
>> This will return the equivalent PHP configuration array.
> Excellent, that's very good to know.
>
>> Now, looking through the code base, there used to be an (undocumented) way
>> of inserting constants in configuration params. But it seems that it was...
>> erm... misplaced when I rewrote the configurator for v2.2. :)
>>
>> Prior to 2.2., this would have worked:
>> log4php.appender.default.file =
>> "${ROOT_APPLICATION_PATH}/runtime/log/log.log"
>>
>> The constant delimited by ${ } would be resolved during configuration. I can
>> fix this to work for 2.3. and I would prefer doing this instead of removing
>> the SCANNER_RAW option.
>>
>> Would this solve all your problems?
> Well, it is still a b/c break :) But it would be nice to have a chance
> to use constants in the ini files again.
>
> I'll wait until the next release to make a decision based on how this turns 
> out.
>
> Thank you very much for your efforts, Ivan.
>
> Best,
>
>
> --
>
> --
> // I don't sleep. I coffee.
> "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein
> "The class object inherits from Chuck Norris."
> "Chuck Norris can divide by zero and can unit test an entire
> application with a single assert."
> "There’s a lot of work happening behind the scenes, courtesy of the
> Spring AOP framework"
> "Why do I have this nagging hunch that you have no idea what you're doing?"
> "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
> security will deserve neither and lose both" - Benjamin Franklin
> "Delivering stupid software faster just get's you more stupid
> software" - Jeff Patton
> "Utilitas, Venustas, Firmitas"
> "Stop breaking tests. Stop it. Just, stop."

Reply via email to