You shouldn't. That is why I'm wondering why the LPGL instead of the Apache license.
Ceki Gulcu wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> Frankly, I'm not sure why you prefer LGPL over the Apache License. Are >> you concerned that Log4j will take parts of Logback? >> > > Why, should I be concerned? > > _______________________________________________ logback-dev mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev
