Hi, No objections at all.
Looking at my .proto file it's indeed pretty obvious that CallerData and StackTraceElement are quite similar :-) http://code.google.com/p/firewood/source/browse/trunk/compare-formats/src/main/java/com/googlecode/firewood/protobuf/logging.proto I've done some benchmarking with protobuf (using the Corpus), and it seems to be at least 4 times faster than Java serialization. Will soon post the results and the code. regards, Maarten On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Ceki Gulcu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to replace the CallerData class with > StackTraceElement. The two classes contain the same fields. > StackTraceElement is part of the JDK. I can think of no valid reason > to duplicate a class found in the JDK. > > Comments/objections? > > -- > Ceki Gülcü > Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for > Java. > http://logback.qos.ch > _______________________________________________ > logback-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev >
_______________________________________________ logback-dev mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev
