On 06.08.2009, at 15:15, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
I think this would be sufficient for most cases but something like
a CONFIDENTIAL marker does also make a lot of sense. This would
simply be configured "around" the appender, right?
Around the appender? I am not sure what you mean, but among the
various data you pass to the appender, you could pass the name of the
marker (a String) that triggers confidential treatment.
What I meant were filters. Sorry about using a rather confusing
description.
I've never used filters before but it seems like a MarkerFilter would
be the "right" way to prevent the tweeting of confidential event
messages.
Joern.
_______________________________________________
logback-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev
