I attached it to LBCLASSIC-176. Ralph
On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I actually have written one but haven't fully tested or committed it to my > fork of Logback. I'll get it committed over the weekend. > > Ralph > > On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Gordon Sims wrote: > >> We recently switched several applications from log4j to logback and were >> wondering about the lack of async appender in logback. Is it not >> needed? I thought it was a good thing for performance and reliability >> reasons. >> >> I see there is an old enhancement request for it in logback bugzilla, >> >> http://bugzilla.qos.ch/show_bug.cgi?id=55 >> >> It seems that someone attempted this earlier this year (but maybe hasn't >> checked in yet?) >> >> http://old.nabble.com/how-to-get-appender-ref-list-via-Joran-to22295581.html#a22295581 >> >> If needed and desired, we could work on a patch for this feature. In >> general, should it work similar to the log4j one? Or is someone else >> already working on it? >> >> thanks, >> -Gordon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> logback-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev > _______________________________________________ logback-dev mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev
