$ "$JAVA_HOME"/bin/java.exe -version
java version "1.7.0"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-b147)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode)
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz 3.40 GHz
Installed memory (RAM): 16.0 GB (15.8 GB usable)
System type: 64-bit Operating System.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:34 PM, ceki <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Which JDK are you running? Which exact CPU?
On 16.04.2013 23:07, Broc Seib wrote:
Hi Carl and Ceki,
I grabbed 3727d7ff0fd33a9584a9ba0ef03695__06fa8f562e right after
Carl
committed it.
$ git log -1
commit 3727d7ff0fd33a9584a9ba0ef03695__06fa8f562e
Author: Carl Harris <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
Date: Tue Apr 16 14:43:35 2013 -0400
removed an unused import to silence a build warning in eclipse
I believe Carl's patch addressed the previous problem I was
seeing. But
I still have some mixed results getting a clean build. When I
first ran
'mvn clean; mvn install' I got an error in Logback Core Module,
in ch.qos.logback.core.appender.__FileAppenderTest. But when I
did 'mvn
clean; mvn install' again, FileAppenderTest worked fine. (Failed
surefire-report included below.)
After Logback Core built, Logback Access Module build fails. See the
test set for ch.qos.logback.access.db.__DBAppenderHSQLTest below.
------------------------------__------------------------------__-------------------
Test set: ch.qos.logback.core.appender.__FileAppenderTest
------------------------------__------------------------------__-------------------
Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.079
sec <<< FAILURE!
testCreateParentFolders(ch.__qos.logback.core.appender.__FileAppenderTest)
Time elapsed: 0.001 sec <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: failed to delete
C:\gitrepo\logback\logback-__core\target\test-output\__fat992837029
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.__java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(__Assert.java:43)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.appender.__FileAppenderTest.__testCreateParentFolders(__FileAppenderTest.java:93)
at sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:__57)
at
sun.reflect.__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.__invoke(Method.java:601)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod$1.__runReflectiveCall(__FrameworkMethod.java:45)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__model.ReflectiveCallable.run(__ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod.__invokeExplosively(__FrameworkMethod.java:42)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.InvokeMethod.__evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runLeaf(__ParentRunner.java:263)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:__68)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:__47)
at org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$3.run(__ParentRunner.java:231)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$1.schedule(__ParentRunner.java:60)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runChildren(__ParentRunner.java:229)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.access$000(__ParentRunner.java:50)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$2.evaluate(__ParentRunner.java:222)
at org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.__java:300)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.__runChild(Suite.java:128)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.__runChild(Suite.java:24)
at org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$3.run(__ParentRunner.java:231)
at
java.util.concurrent.__Executors$RunnableAdapter.__call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.__FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(__FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.__FutureTask.run(FutureTask.__java:166)
at
java.util.concurrent.__ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(__ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at
java.util.concurrent.__ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(__ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.__java:722)
smoke(ch.qos.logback.core.__appender.FileAppenderTest) Time
elapsed:
0.049 sec
testPrudentModeLogicalImplicat__ions(ch.qos.logback.core.__appender.FileAppenderTest)
Time elapsed: 0.02 sec
testNewAppender(ch.qos.__logback.core.appender.__FileAppenderTest)
Time
elapsed: 0 sec
testConfiguredAppender(ch.qos.__logback.core.appender.__FileAppenderTest)
Time elapsed: 0.002 sec
testNoStart(ch.qos.logback.__core.appender.__FileAppenderTest) Time
elapsed: 0.001 sec
------------------------------__------------------------------__-------------------
Test set: ch.qos.logback.access.db.__DBAppenderHSQLTest
------------------------------__------------------------------__-------------------
Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.207
sec <<< FAILURE!
testAppendAccessEvent(ch.qos.__logback.access.db.__DBAppenderHSQLTest)
Time
elapsed: 0.026 sec
testAppendHeaders(ch.qos.__logback.access.db.__DBAppenderHSQLTest)
Time
elapsed: 0.006 sec
testAppendMultipleEvents(ch.__qos.logback.access.db.__DBAppenderHSQLTest)
Time elapsed: 0.022 sec
testCheckNoHeadersAreInserted(__ch.qos.logback.access.db.__DBAppenderHSQLTest)
Time elapsed: 0.009 sec <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.__java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(__Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(__Assert.java:68)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(__Assert.java:79)
at
ch.qos.logback.access.db.__DBAppenderHSQLTest.__testCheckNoHeadersAreInserted(__DBAppenderHSQLTest.java:148)
at sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:__57)
at
sun.reflect.__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.__invoke(Method.java:601)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod$1.__runReflectiveCall(__FrameworkMethod.java:45)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__model.ReflectiveCallable.run(__ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod.__invokeExplosively(__FrameworkMethod.java:42)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.InvokeMethod.__evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.RunBefores.__evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.RunAfters.evaluate(__RunAfters.java:30)
at org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runLeaf(__ParentRunner.java:263)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:__68)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:__47)
at org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$3.run(__ParentRunner.java:231)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$1.schedule(__ParentRunner.java:60)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runChildren(__ParentRunner.java:229)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.access$000(__ParentRunner.java:50)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$2.evaluate(__ParentRunner.java:222)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.RunBefores.__evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.RunAfters.evaluate(__RunAfters.java:30)
at org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.__java:300)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(__JUnit4Provider.java:252)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__junit4.JUnit4Provider.__executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.__java:141)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(__JUnit4Provider.java:112)
at sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:__57)
at
sun.reflect.__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.__invoke(Method.java:601)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__util.ReflectionUtils.__invokeMethodWithArray(__ReflectionUtils.java:189)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__booter.ProviderFactory$__ProviderProxy.invoke(__ProviderFactory.java:165)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__booter.ProviderFactory.__invokeProvider(__ProviderFactory.java:85)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__booter.ForkedBooter.__runSuitesInProcess(__ForkedBooter.java:115)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.__booter.ForkedBooter.main(__ForkedBooter.java:75)
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Harris, Carl <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
Last couple of commits should help reduce timing
sensitivity in the
SocketConnectorBaseTest and SocketAppenderTest. Anxious to
hear if
this improves matters for you Broc.
carl
On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Broc Seib wrote:
Here it is:
------------------------------__------------------------------__-------------------
Test set: ch.qos.logback.core.net
<http://ch.qos.logback.core.net>.__SocketConnectorBaseTest
------------------------------__------------------------------__-------------------
Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
5.596 sec <<< FAILURE!
testConnect(ch.qos.logback.__core.net
<http://core.net>.__SocketConnectorBaseTest) Time
elapsed: 0.081 sec
testConnectEventually(ch.qos.__logback.core.net
<http://logback.core.net>.__SocketConnectorBaseTest)
Time elapsed: 2.514 sec
testConnectionFails(ch.qos.__logback.core.net
<http://logback.core.net>.__SocketConnectorBaseTest)
Time elapsed: 0.001 sec <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.__java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(__Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(__Assert.java:68)
at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(__Assert.java:79)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.net
<http://ch.qos.logback.core.net>.__SocketConnectorBaseTest.__testConnectionFails(__SocketConnectorBaseTest.java:__89)
at sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke0(Native
Method)
at
sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:__57)
at
sun.reflect.__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.__invoke(Method.java:601)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod$1.__runReflectiveCall(__FrameworkMethod.java:45)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__model.ReflectiveCallable.run(__ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod.__invokeExplosively(__FrameworkMethod.java:42)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.InvokeMethod.__evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.RunBefores.__evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.RunAfters.evaluate(__RunAfters.java:30)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runLeaf(__ParentRunner.java:263)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:__68)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:__47)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$3.run(__ParentRunner.java:231)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$1.schedule(__ParentRunner.java:60)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runChildren(__ParentRunner.java:229)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.access$000(__ParentRunner.java:50)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$2.evaluate(__ParentRunner.java:222)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.__java:300)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.__runChild(Suite.java:128)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.__runChild(Suite.java:24)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$3.run(__ParentRunner.java:231)
at
java.util.concurrent.__Executors$RunnableAdapter.__call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.__FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(__FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.__FutureTask.run(FutureTask.__java:166)
at
java.util.concurrent.__ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(__ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at
java.util.concurrent.__ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(__ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.__java:722)
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Harris, Carl
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>><__mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
Broc,
Would you please send the surefire-report for the test
ch.qos.logback.core.net
<http://ch.qos.logback.core.net>.__SocketConnectorBaseTest,
so I can take a look to see where/why it is failing?
logback-core/target/surefire-__reports/ch.qos.logback.core.__net.SocketConnectorBaseTest.__txt
Thanks,
carl
On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Broc Seib wrote:
Hi Ceki,
I just updated to the latest code you just committed,
56e8ab2192697bc27a8cfbd8441db6__2aff53e87c but I think
there is a
different problem now.
bseib@BSEIB-WIN7 /c/gitrepo
$ rm -rf logback
bseib@BSEIB-WIN7 /c/gitrepo
$ git clone https://github.com/qos-ch/__logback.git
<https://github.com/qos-ch/logback.git>
Cloning into 'logback'...
remote: Counting objects: 52855, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (13701/13701), done.
remote: Total 52855 (delta 26607), reused 52138 (delta 26038)
Receiving objects: 100% (52855/52855), 20.13 MiB | 1.17
MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (26607/26607), done.
bseib@BSEIB-WIN7 /c/gitrepo
$ cd logback/
bseib@BSEIB-WIN7 /c/gitrepo/logback (master)
$ git log -1
commit 56e8ab2192697bc27a8cfbd8441db6__2aff53e87c
Merge: 2ff61c7 513e380
Author: Ceki Gulcu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>><mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>>
Date: Tue Apr 16 18:09:23 2013 +0200
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:qos-ch/logback
And then 'mvn clean; mvn install':
[...]
Running
ch.qos.logback.core.joran.__conditional.__IfThenElseAndIncludeCompositio__nTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.635 sec
includeNestedWithinIf(ch.qos.__logback.core.joran.__conditional.__IfThenElseAndIncludeCompositio__nTest)
Time elapsed: 0.635 sec
Results :
Failed tests:
testConnectionFails(ch.qos.__logback.core.net
<http://logback.core.net>.__SocketConnectorBaseTest)
lossyAppenderShouldOnlyLooseCe__rtainEvents(ch.qos.logback.__core.AsyncAppenderBaseTest):
expected:<8> but was:<10>
Tests run: 424, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 6
[INFO]
------------------------------__------------------------------__------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Logback-Parent
..............................__...... SUCCESS
[0.244s]
[INFO] Logback Core Module
..............................__. FAILURE
[27.251s]
[INFO] Logback Classic Module ............................
SKIPPED
[INFO] Logback Access Module .............................
SKIPPED
[INFO] Logback Site
..............................__........ SKIPPED
[INFO] Logback Examples Module ...........................
SKIPPED
[INFO]
------------------------------__------------------------------__------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
------------------------------__------------------------------__------------
[INFO] Total time: 28.014s
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Apr 16 12:51:50 EDT 2013
[INFO] Final Memory: 28M/308M
[INFO]
------------------------------__------------------------------__------------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:__maven-surefire-plugin:2.12.4:__test
(default-test) on project logback-core: There are test
failures.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:42 PM, ceki <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>><mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote:
I am hoping that commit [1] should make the test failures in
logback-core/src/test/java/ch/__qos/logback/core/rolling
disappear.
[1]
https://github.com/qos-ch/__logback/commit/2ff61c7c1cb0562
<https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/commit/2ff61c7c1cb0562>
On 16.04.2013 06:05, Broc Seib wrote:
Yes, I've done "mvn clean; mvn install" but still get a
failure. I'm
also on a 3.4GHz Win7 box with a SSD. Is there any
possibility of a
timing sensitivity for being "too fast"?
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
elapsed: 0.557
sec <<< FA
ILURE!
withZipCompression_FileSet___NoRestart_7(ch.qos.logback.__core.rolling.SizeAndTimeBa
sedFNATP_Test) Time elapsed: 0.201 sec
withGZCompression_FileBlank___NoRestart_6(ch.qos.logback.__core.rolling.SizeAndTimeB
asedFNATP_Test) Time elapsed: 0.006 sec <<< ERROR!
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
target\test-output\910764289\__test6-2013-04-15_23_
47_35-1.txt (The system cannot find the file specified)
at java.io.FileInputStream.open(__Native Method)
at
java.io.FileInputStream.<init>__(FileInputStream.java:138)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.testUtil.__FileToBufferUtil.__regularReadIntoList(Fil
eToBufferUtil.java:60)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.testUtil.__FileToBufferUtil.readIntoList(__FileToBuff
erUtil.java:38)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.__ScaffoldingForRollingTests.__fileContentChe
ck(ScaffoldingForRollingTests.__java:84)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.__ScaffoldingForRollingTests.__sortedContentC
heck(__ScaffoldingForRollingTests.__java:99)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.__SizeAndTimeBasedFNATP_Test.__generic(SizeAn
dTimeBasedFNATP_Test.java:130)
at
ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.__SizeAndTimeBasedFNATP_Test.__withGZCompress
ion_FileBlank_NoRestart_6(__SizeAndTimeBasedFNATP_Test.__java:189)
at
sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(__NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
java:57)
at
sun.reflect.__DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.__invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
sorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.__invoke(Method.java:601)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod$1.__runReflectiveCall(Framework
Method.java:45)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__model.ReflectiveCallable.run(__ReflectiveCal
lable.java:15)
at
org.junit.runners.model.__FrameworkMethod.__invokeExplosively(FrameworkMe
thod.java:42)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.InvokeMethod.__evaluate(InvokeMet
hod.java:20)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.__statements.RunBefores.__evaluate(RunBefores.
java:28)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runLeaf(__ParentRunner.java:263)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRun
ner.java:68)
at
org.junit.runners.__BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.__runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRun
ner.java:47)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$3.run(__ParentRunner.java:231)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$1.schedule(__ParentRunner.java:60)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.runChildren(__ParentRunner.java:229)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.access$000(__ParentRunner.java:50)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$2.evaluate(__ParentRunner.java:222)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.__java:300)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.__runChild(Suite.java:128)
at org.junit.runners.Suite.__runChild(Suite.java:24)
at
org.junit.runners.__ParentRunner$3.run(__ParentRunner.java:231)
at
java.util.concurrent.__Executors$RunnableAdapter.__call(Executors.java:47
1)
at
java.util.concurrent.__FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(__FutureTask.java:334)
at
java.util.concurrent.__FutureTask.run(FutureTask.__java:166)
at
java.util.concurrent.__ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(__ThreadPoolExecutor.
java:1110)
at
java.util.concurrent.__ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(__ThreadPoolExecutor
.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.__java:722)
withGZCompression_FileSet___NoRestart_5(ch.qos.logback.__core.rolling.SizeAndTimeBas
edFNATP_Test) Time elapsed: 0.067 sec
noCompression_FileSet___WithStopStart_4(ch.qos.__logback.core.rolling.__SizeAndTimeBas
edFNATP_Test) Time elapsed: 0.102 sec
noCompression_FileBlank___WithStopStart_3(ch.qos.__logback.core.rolling.__SizeAndTimeB
asedFNATP_Test) Time elapsed: 0.061 sec
noCompression_FileBlank___NoRestart_2(ch.qos.logback.__core.rolling.SizeAndTimeBased
FNATP_Test) Time elapsed: 0.036 sec
noCompression_FileSet___NoRestart_1(ch.qos.logback.__core.rolling.__SizeAndTimeBasedFN
ATP_Test) Time elapsed: 0.039 sec
Running
ch.qos.logback.core.recovery.__ResilientOutputStreamTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.288 sec
verifyRecuperationAfterFailure__(ch.qos.logback.core.recovery.__ResilientOutputStrea
mTest) Time elapsed: 0.288 sec
Running ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.__helper.CompressTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.253 sec
test2(ch.qos.logback.core.__rolling.helper.CompressTest)
Time elapsed:
0.223 sec
test1(ch.qos.logback.core.__rolling.helper.CompressTest)
Time elapsed:
0.018 sec
test3(ch.qos.logback.core.__rolling.helper.CompressTest)
Time elapsed:
0.012 sec
Results :
Tests in error:
withGZCompression_FileBlank___NoRestart_6(ch.qos.logback.__core.rolling.SizeAndTim
eBasedFNATP_Test):
target\test-output\910764289\__test6-2013-04-15_23_47_35-1.__txt
(The system cannot find the file specified)
Tests run: 424, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 6
[INFO]
