At 05:08 PM 2/7/2007, Eric Crahen wrote:
Hi,
I've been experimenting with logback + slf4j and have been quite
impressed. The slf4j API is what I write new code against, and I'm able
to leverage the jcl104-over-slf4j facade and logback-log4j-bridge to
intercept calls to commons logging and log4j respectively. This works
really well so far. I do have one other legacy logging API that is used
in some circumstances. That's the jdk14 jul api. Has anyone written a jul
Handler that will route jul calls to logback? Any comments on how well
that has/would work out?
Many thanks. It's always a pleasure to hear good things about one's work.
Except for bug#23 (see [1]) which is usually not blocking, the
jcl104-over-slf4j bridge is known to work well for some time now. The
logback-log4j-bridge is much more recent and works surprisingly well thus
far. We currently use it in all our legacy systems in production.
Although we have not attempted to do so, bridging the jul API should be
possible. After all, x4juli does it. Would you mind creating a bug report
so that we implement this feature for the next release of logback?
[1] http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23
Thanks,
--
- Eric
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
