Is there a reason logback isn't taking advantage of the java.util.concurrent
package?

For example, LoggerContext uses a Hashtable (which synchronizes all access)
rather than a ConcurrentHashMap, which supports lock-free read access.

anders
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/LoggerContext-not-using-java.util.concurrent--tf3394203.html#a9449203
Sent from the Logback User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user

Reply via email to