Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> Joern Huxhorn skrev:
>> Does anyone have a good idea (or even a solution) how to tackle that
>> problem?
> Use the log.whatever("foo {} bar {}", ...) approach and avoid the if?
Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> To modify code coverage software to handle this situation?
>
> LZ
Hi guys,
neither suggestion would help in our situation.
We have a large code-base which contains
if(logger.isXxxEnabled()) logger.xxx(...);
Changing all loggings statements isn't an option.
Beside that, we also have code like
if(logger.isXxxEnabled())
{
// perform lots of preparation, construct large message using
StringBuilder etc.
logger.xxx(builder.toString());
}
Code like that may actually contain a bug (and did so in the past) so I
*want* to run all tests, once with Level.ALL and once with Level.OFF.
I thought maybe someone has already found a solution but I should
probably ask that question on a junit mailinglist...
Thanks anyway,
Joern.
_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
