On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ceki Gulcu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If you have a hard dependency on log4j that you can't change then I > > guess you have to use log4j. > > I agree but may be the caller could be satisfied with NOP. > > It should be possible to satisfy most callers except perhaps in > certain cases which could become rather hard to diagnose due to the > NOP trickery...
In that case it might be nice to let the caller implement the log4j functionality or at least allow it to be optionally included so the caller *can* implement it. For what it is worth it I haven't ever had this problem. --Nik
_______________________________________________ Logback-user mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
