I much prefer things to fail fast and ugly rather than gracefully skipping over and leaving me scratching my head as to why it's working but not the way I expected.
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael C Rosenstein" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 1:33:56 PM > Subject: Re: [logback-user] Using conditional processing > > In the absence of Janino on the classpath, logback should now > > gracefully > > skip over the conditional part. > > I wonder if it should be less graceful and produce an error/warning to > indicate that the conditional is going to be ignored? > _______________________________________________ > Logback-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user _______________________________________________ Logback-user mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
