If I have a configuration file like the following:
<appender name="file" class="ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.RollingFileAppender">
<File>test.log</File>
<encoder>
<pattern>... </pattern>
</encoder>
<rollingPolicy
class="ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingPolicy">
<fileNamePattern>test.%d{yyyy-MM}.%i.log</fileNamePattern>
<maxHistory>2</maxHistory>
<timeBasedFileNamingAndTriggeringPolicy
class="ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.SizeAndTimeBasedFNATP">
<maxFileSize>10MB</maxFileSize>
</timeBasedFileNamingAndTriggeringPolicy>
</rollingPolicy>
</appender>
The max history parameter here , does it mean
test.2011-04.0.log
test.2011-04.1.log
And then renaming test.log.2011-04.1.log to test.2011-04.0.log. The new logs go
to the file test.2011-04.1.log
Or does it mean
test.2011-04.0.log
test.2011-04.1.log
test.2011-04.2.log
test.2011-04.3.log
test.2011-04.4.log..... Having as many index as needed. But saving this files
for 2 months. So that we have something like the following:
test.2011-04.0.log
test.2011-04.1.log
test.2011-04.2.log
test.2011-04.3.log.......
test.2011-05.0.log
test.2011-05.1.log......
Now when we have logs for 2011-06 delete the logs for 2011-04.
Which condition applies when you have maxHistory for a filename pattern like
'<fileNamePattern>test.%d{yyyy-MM}.%i.log</fileNamePattern>'
Thanks
Neha
---
This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this communication in
error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this communication. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
communication is strictly forbidden.
Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the information
contained in this communication should not be regarded as such.
_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
