On 2017-02-23T19:10:15 +0100 Ceki Gülcü <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think we use semantic versioning. Semantic versioning allows > “unlimited” changes when the MAJOR version is changed. In both SLF4J and > logback projects the major version has been stuck at 1. > > The rule of thumb is as long as the slf4j-api and the binding versions > are the same, you should be fine for any version of slf4j-api. For > recent versions of logback, the slf4j-api version should be at least 1.7.16. > > As for logback, for the vast majority of users changes should be > transparent unless you are writing your own logback extensions in which > case some minor adjustments might be necessary from time to time. > > To answer your question directly, the version range [1.7.16, 1.8.0) for > slf4j-api should be safe. >
Sounds good, thanks! M
pgpHeLIjMZtBh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ logback-user mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
