Todd Troxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:56:39AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote: > > p.s. Does the "patch" tag literally mean patch with some automation > > implications, or that a fix is included? > > I am not sure what you mean by automation implications, but I suspect it's > not that specific. > > The official defintiion is: > > "A patch or some other easy procedure for fixing the bug is included in the > bug logs. If there's a patch, but it doesn't resolve the bug adequately or > causes some other problems, this tag should not be used."
OK, I guess we can assume my one-liner would be considered an "easy procedure." ;-) -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
