also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.02.0012 +0200]: > >As far as I can tell, Postfix adds extended status codes, so instead > >of "250", you now get "250 2.0.0". > > Most of the rules have been updated to include these. If you find > any which have not been, file a bug.
Are you sure? If I look at e.g. violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix, some of the most common rules, like relay access denied warnings, have *not* been updated for postfix 2.3, which is still in experimental. > >Why not move them to the postfix package? > > I don't see a reason to upset the status quo? Sure, that's always a reason, but Debian wouldn't be where it is if we always had chosen to do nothing. Look at the postfix filter files, there are so many old rules in there that will never match, and there are rules that apply only to e.g. 2.2... why should my logcheck even need to look at them when I have 2.3 installed. logcheck-database is an okay package during a transition, but in the long run, packages should be providing their own logcheck files! The idea is not for logcheck files to provide as many rules as possible, but to provide those rules applicable to a package. And this is only possible if the package itself provides the rules. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught." -- oscar wilde
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
