also sprach Todd Troxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.26.0405 +0100]: > Yes, yes it should. There was a bug report about this > somewhere... Gah!
Yes, I remember, but I could not find it. > To be clear, the violations.ignore.d should filter things are the ignore.d > level. Currently it does not. Should we declare it a feature and call violations.ignore.d a deescalation filter instead? -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system "gott ist tot! und wir haben ihn getötet." - friedrich nietzsche
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
