Hi guys, I have the feeling that we have not yet reached consensus on what violations.ignore.d should be:
- a set of filters that apply to violations; any line filtered
will disappear completely from the logcheck mails
- a set of filters that apply to violations; any line filtered
will automatically be de-escalated to a normal system event.
I think we must figure this out before etch. Could you please offer
your input?
If I don't hear anything before next week, I will assume that we
want de-escalation, which seems to be the current way things are
going.
(logcheck is so ready for a rewrite from scratch...)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
