Frédéric Brière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[0-9]+\]:? [._[:alnum:]-]+
> \([:._[:alnum:]-]+\[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]\)(:| -) USER [-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such
> user found from [.:_[:alnum:]-]+ \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\] to
> [.:[:xdigit:]]+:[[:digit:]]{2,5}$
> +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[0-9]+\]:? [._[:alnum:]-]+
> \([:._[:alnum:]-]+\[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]\)(:| -) USER [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [.:_[:alnum:]-]+
> \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\] to [.:[:xdigit:]]+:[[:digit:]]{2,5}$
For some reason, 456aef8691bbf408b7884896676ee59520bcc6a1 added the "@"
character to the hostname instead of the user name. Was this
intentional?
--
Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.
-- Santiago Vila on debian-devel
_______________________________________________
Logcheck-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
