On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 10:16:22AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > tags 479278 patch > thanks > > also sprach John Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.05.04.0615 +0100]: > > I won't bother attaching the patch =). > > That's a shame.
I feel silly now - I had thought "nail" was a typo for "mail". > So try mine, attached, and please report back. I've applied it and it works: the logcheck output is sent as the message body and the nail error is sent at the bottom. However, I can't find a package that provides nail. The nail package is a dummy package which depends on heirloom-mailx, but that doesn't provide a symlink for nail or anything. Should I file a bug for heirloom-mailx and/or nail? Or should logcheck not try to use nail? Also, the logcheck package depends on mailx, which can be satisfied by bsd-mailx, mailutils, and a dummy mailx package, but not heirloom-mailx. Should that be a separate bug? Thanks, John
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
