clone 488102 -1 reassign -1 debian-policy retitle -1 make mailx a registered virtual package name severity -1 wishlist thanks
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.06.27.0212 +0200]: > Piotr Kaczuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Before 1.2.65 logcheck depended on mailx, which was and still is > > provided by both mailutils and bsd-mailx. Now that logcheck depends > > explicitly on bsd-mailx, you can't have installed both logcheck and > > mailutils because mailutils and bsd-mailx exclude each other. > > mailx is not a registered virtual package name in Policy. It sounds like > it should be? If unrelated packages should know about it for > dependencies, I don't think it meets the "private use among coordinated > packages" exception. > > (This doesn't change anything that you're saying about logcheck, just > implies that there's also a Policy bug.) Cloned. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
