also sprach Hanspeter Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.07.1340 +0200]: > yes, but my question was of a different nature: WHERE should I add the > keywords? I guess re-adding them back to violations.d/logcheck is > pointless.
why? we just removed them all because we did not see a point. if you make a convincing point about one of the other keyword to be added back, that'll do. > And I also do not want to add them to cracking.d/ (for obvious reasons) i don't see the "obvious" part. i also don't know what keywords you're talking about, nor what you are trying to achieve. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems micro$oft: "you've got questions? we've got dancing paperclips."
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
