J Yves, "The ordinary man has always been sane because the ordinary man has always been a mystic. [...] He has always cared for truth more than for consistency. If he saw two truths that seemed to contradict each other, he would take the two truths and the contradiction along with them."
no estoy entrando en el juego. simplemente quería decir que a mi me parece que los dos casos que se presentan en la cita son un poco diferentes en lo siguiente. no tiene nada que ver con la parte técnica de las lógicas paraconsistentes, que no conozco, sino con el tipo de contradicciones que se presentan en cada caso o en el efecto que estas producen en cada caso. en el del místico, por ejemplo, uno podría decir que una vez asumidas las dos verdades y asumida con ello la contradicción, esto no constituye un problema sino casi podría decirse que una liberación. pero en el hombre común, una contradicción puede conducir en algunos casos (o en muchos, no sé) a enfermedades o a crear situaciones dificiles a los que están a su o a nuestro alrededor. esto me hace preguntarme hasta qué punto sería conveniente, para todos los casos, quedarse en un raciocinio con contradicciones (un raciocinio quizá inconsciente) y no más bien intentar hacerla consciente y resolverla, esto es, escoger una de las dos partes o crear una tercera posibilidad. no sé... me parece que la cuestión del raciocinio con contradicciones puede funcionar muy bien en contextos como la ficción, el arte, la física, algunos aspectos de la psicología y otros campos, pero tal vez crearía problemas en el campo de las relaciones interpersonales o a niveles más altos como el funcionamiento de instituciones. no sé si fui clara. si no, pido disculpas. abrazos, susana --- On Wed, 10/8/08, BEZIAU Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: BEZIAU Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Logica-l] PARACONSISTENT NEWSLETTER - SUMMER 2008 > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 11:06 PM > PARACONSISTENT NEWSLETTER - SUMMER 2008 > > "The ordinary man has always been sane because the > ordinary man has always > been a mystic. [...] He has always cared for truth more > than for > consistency. If he saw two truths that seemed to contradict > each other, he > would take the two truths and the contradiction along with > them." > > Guess who said that and win free vacations to the island of > inconsistencies ! > Decision between winners will be made on the basis of > further information: title of the book and page number. > the winner, if any, will be announced in the next > newsletter. > The quotation of the last newsletter was: > > The legitmate use of contradiction consists when two > incompatible truths impose themselves to human > intelligence, to recognize them as such and to turn them > into the two harms of a forceps, a tool to be in direct > touch with the transcendent truth, inaccesible to our > intelligence. > > Nobody found who said that so that the jackpot is now 1 > million years in the island of inconsistencies. > > ************************************************************* > RECENT PUBLICATIONS OF INTEREST FOR PARACONSISTENT > LOGICIANS > > J.Cantwell, "The Logic of Conditional Negation", > Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 49, Number 3 (2008), > 245-260. > > C.Hewitt, “Development of Logic Programming: What went > wrong, What was done about it, and What it might mean for > the future” > “What Went Wrong and Why” Workshop Proceedings. > AAAI-08. July 13, 2008. > http://logicprogrammingdevelopment.carlhewitt.info/ > > G.Robles, "A Note on the Non-Involutive Routley > Star" > Bulletion of the section of logic, 37/1, 2008, pp.19-28. > > J.Marcos, "Possible-translations semantics for some > weak classically-based paraconsistent logics" > Journal of applied non-classical logic, vol 18/1 - 2008, > pp.7-28. > > M. Spinks and R. Veroff, "Constructive Logic with > Strong Negation is a Substructural Logic. II" > Studia Logica, Volume 89, Number 3, 2008, pp.401-425 > > Special Issue of the Journal Logica Universalis on the > Square of Opposition > http://www.springerlink.com/content/l8rj3631747w/?p=7007dea8d0f343b188f373f592e60ef8&pi=0 > > ************************************************************* > FORTHCOMING EVENTS OF INTEREST FOR PARACONSISTENT LOGICIANS > > Logic, Now and Then > November 5-7, Leuven, Belgium > http://www.crissp.be/lnat.html > > Australasian Association of Philosophy - New Zealand > Division > 2008 Conference > December 7-11, Christchurch, New Zeland > http://www.phil.canterbury.ac.nz/aap2008conference/ > > InterOntology 2009 > 2nd Interdisciplinary Ontology Conference > Tokyo, Japan > February 27 to March 1, 2009 > http://abelard.flet.keio.ac.jp/InterOntology09 > > ************************************************************* > WEBSITES OF INTEREST FOR PARACONSISTENT LOGICIANS > > http://inconsistentthoughts.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/paraconsistency-and-dialetheism > > http://blogandnot-blog.blogspot.com/ > > http://www.paraconsistency.org > > > ********************************************************************* > Jean-Yves Béziau > Brazilian Science Foundation, Fortaleza, FUNCAP/CNPq > _______________________________________________ > Logica-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l _______________________________________________ Logica-l mailing list [email protected] http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l
