---------- Forwarded message ---------
De: Marco Panza <[email protected]>
Date: sáb, 29 de ago de 2020 19:34
Subject: OCIE Seminar, September 8th Reminder
To: Mihaela Vajiac <[email protected]>, Dressel, Justin <
[email protected]>, Schmid College of Science Faculty <
[email protected]>, Dashiell, Frederick <[email protected]>, Dacier,
Dana <[email protected]>, Robin Pendergraft <[email protected]>,
Ehwerhemuepha, Louis <[email protected]>, G. Pace <[email protected]>,
Herbert W. Hamber <[email protected]>, Suceava, Bogdan <
[email protected]>, [email protected] <
[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Tu,
Kai-Wen <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Jeremy Heis
<[email protected]>, Gabriel Uzquiano <[email protected]>, Stella Moon <
[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Coliva Annalisa <
[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Virginia Warren <[email protected]>,
Charles Hughes <[email protected]>, Bas Van der Vossen <
[email protected]>, Kelvin McQueen <[email protected]>, Michael
Robinson <[email protected]>, John Thrasher IV <
[email protected]>, Brennan McDavid <[email protected]>, Fabian
Wendt <[email protected]>, Lucia Rafanelli <[email protected]>, Keith
Hankins <[email protected]>, M. Andrew Moshier <[email protected]>,
John Mumma <[email protected]>, Jemma Lorenat <[email protected]>,
Erich Reck <[email protected]>, SCOTT RANDAL TIDWELL <[email protected]>,
Joanne Walters-Wayland <[email protected]>, James Francese <
[email protected]>, Daniel Briseno <[email protected]>, <
[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Alexander Kurz <
[email protected]>, szczeciniarz <
[email protected]>, Daniele Struppa <
[email protected]>, Richard T. W. Arthur <[email protected]>, Ivan
Magrin-Chagnolleau <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
Benedict Eastaugh <[email protected]>, Marianna Antonutti <
[email protected]>, Gerhard Heinzmann <
[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Walter
Carnielli <[email protected]>, Will Stafford <[email protected]>, <
[email protected]>, Bruno Bentzen <[email protected]>, <
[email protected]>, Alfredo Roque Freire <[email protected]>


Dear all,

The next (online) section of the OCIE Seminar in the History and Philosophy
of Mathematics and Logic. It will be held on

*Tuesday September 8th, 4-6pm, *
via Zoom:

Zoom Meeting ID: 958 5957 5948


*Alfredo Roque Freire (Unicamp, Campinas, CLE / Univ. of San Paulo)* will
present a talk on “Intentional Theory Dichotomy and Twisted models of set
theory”

Abstract — The universalist position in set theory maintains that there is
only a single, maximal universe of sets and, as a result, all sentences
about these objects are ideally verifiable. Often, those who subscribe to
this view are committed to offering a sensible account to alternative
universes familiar to many mathematicians. In this talk, I will analyze the
reduction strategies offered by universalists. Recently, Enayat in [1]
proved that no two models of ZF are bi-interpretable, while Hamkins and I
in [2] proved that no two well-founded models of ZF are mutually
interpretable. In view of these results, I will argue that the range of the
construction for alternative universes in a single universe is limited.
Thus, the adherents of an alternative universe have sufficient grounds to
reject the alleged copy offered by the universalist as a faithful copy.
Finally, I will argue that the reasons for adding new elements to the
multiverse should be specific instead of being the result of an emulation
in a previously known universe.

[1] Enayat, A. (2017). Variations on a Visserian theme. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1702.07093.
[2] Freire, A. R., & Hamkins, J. D. (2020). Bi-interpretation in weak set
theories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05262.


*The section is co-organised with CLE (Unicamp), and is included in the
Logic Supergroup program.*



Next Section:

*Tuesday 22th September, 4pm-6pm, Bruno Bentzen *(Carnegie Mellon Univ.,
Pittsburgh), “Frege's anticipation of simple type theory”

Abstract: In this talk, I argue that Frege's sharp distinction between
terms denoting objects and terms denoting functions on the basis of their
saturation anticipate a version of simple type theory, although  Frege
vacillates between regarding functions as closed terms of a function type
and open terms formed under a hypothetical judgment. In the end, Frege
fails to express his logical views consistently due to his logicist
ambitions, which require him to endorse the view that value-ranges are
objects.

You are all invited to join us on Zoom.

Zoom link:  https://uci.zoom.us/j/95859575948


You can also download and import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to
your calendar system.
Weekly:
https://uci.zoom.us/meeting/tJElcuCtqT4jHtxM_qY1EiO0RJ5-BIY_CzwI/ics?icsToken=98tyKuCtpj4jH9OQuR2PRowMGo_4Xe_wtiVEgrdFsSD0OnF2ayymBMgXf5BWKefz


All the best,


Marco Panza

-- 
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos 
Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um 
e-mail para [email protected].
Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse 
https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CA%2Bob58Miidnecw0NjAsdD1igFoT_fy24dEe%2Bx8jM2iJE188jbg%40mail.gmail.com.

Responder a