On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Jorge Llambías <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> {ca} indicates simultaneity, not sequentiality. Did you mean
> {gi'e ba bo}?
Yes.
But I also wanted to mean that the event of prami is simultaneous with "now".
Maybe {nau} is what I need?
> .i mi do ca ke ge pu nelci gi prami
Why {ke}? Isn't {ge} good enough to delineate the scope to which {ca} functions?
mi'e vid
