On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Geoffrey Stewart < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Timo Paulssen < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Geoffrey Stewart wrote: >>>> > Hello, is this the Lojban beginner's mailing list? (otherwise I'm >>>> going to >>>> > look like a fool...) >>>> Yes, you really are right here. >>> >>> >>>> > Assuming it is, coi! I've been learning the language for a few months >>>> now >>>> > and thought I'd say hello. >>>> Aaw, it's a pity you're so late to the party :) >>>> >>>> fi'i djefris, Welcome to the mailing list! You should also consider >>>> stopping by >>>> the IRC channel some day, too. It's all good fun there :) >>>> > >>>> > mu'omi'e djefris. >>>> > >>>> >>>> mu'o mi'e timos >>>> >>> >>> Great, good to see I'm in the right place. >>> >>> .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le glico .e le fraso .e le >>> latmo to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u toi >>> >>> I hope my sentences were constructed properly. By the way, why is it >>> kadno, and not something closer like kando or knado? >>> >> >> coi fi'i >> >> *{kando} would conflict with {kandi}; their 4-letter & 5-letter rafsi >> would be the same. *{knado} includes a forbidden initial consonant pair. ( >> *Complete Lojban Language* 3:7) >> >> mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan >> > > Er, "their 4-letter rafsi would be the same". > > .e'o I guess I'll just have to live with it then. mu'o mi'e djefris
